Validation and Adaptation of the HEALTHQUAL-KZ Questionnaire for Comprehensive Healthcare Quality Assessment in Public−Private Partnerships
Keywords:
public-private partnership, HEALTHQUAL questionnaire, linguistic adaptation of the questionnaire, satisfaction with medical careAbstract
The assessment of healthcare quality and patient satisfaction in public−private partnerships (PPPs) remains a critical but underexplored area, that has been identified as a priority by international health organizations. These metrics are essential for evaluating healthcare management models and shaping systems that meet population needs.
This study aimed to develop a scientifically valid and culturally adapted version of the HEALTHQUAL questionnaire for Kazakhstan, based on the rigorous linguistic adaptation of the Portuguese version.
Materials and Methods: The adaptation process involved translating the HEALTHQUAL-KZ questionnaire into Russian and Kazakh and then conducting a comprehensive validation process to ensure cultural and contextual relevance. To assess content and external validity, data from 100 randomly selected medical records were drawn from the integrated medical information system (MIS) at the Almaty Multidisciplinary Clinical Hospital, representing cases treated both three years before and three years after the PPP (Patient Protection Program) implementation. The adapted questionnaire's reliability was confirmed through Cronbach's alpha (α > 0.7) for internal consistency and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability. These measures ensured the methodological robustness of the study.
Results: The HEALTHQUAL-KZ questionnaire, which was validated, consists of 25 questions divided into five domains, demonstrated high reliability in all domains, as supported by Cronbach's Alpha and Spearman's rank correlation. The average completion time was approximately 12 minutes and 35 seconds. No significant correlation was found between demographic factors (age, education) and satisfaction levels, confirming the objectivity of the tool.
Conclusion: This study presents the first validated adaptation of the HEALTHQUAL questionnaire for the healthcare context in Kazakhstan, offering a reliable instrument for assessing healthcare quality and patient satisfaction in PPP models. The significance of this research lies in its innovative methodological approach, providing a framework that can be transferred and adapted to other countries with similar healthcare systems and challenges. While it has local relevance, this work also contributes to the global discussion on improving healthcare through PPPs by offering a model for adapting healthcare quality assessment tools across cultures. This framework has the potential to standardize quality metrics and enable meaningful comparisons between diverse healthcare settings, advancing the field of healthcare research.
Downloads
References
Antunes, Helmer Magalhães, Magalhães, Lívia de Castro Magalhães, Galton Carvalho Vasconcelos, Bruno Lovaglio Cançado Trindade, Ana Claudia Moreira Gonzaga and Renata Pereira Gonçalves Antunes. 2022. “Catquest-9SF questionnaire: validation of the Portuguese version using the Rasch analysis”. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, vol. 86, 156−163. https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20230036.
Aitmagambetov, A. R., V. B. Molotov-Luchansky and D. B. Kulov. 2020. “Validation of a questionnaire to assess the commitment of nursing professionals in the formation and improvement of a safe hospital environment”. Medicine and ecology, vol. 3(96), 96−100.
Baru, Rama and Madhurima Nundy. 2008. “Blurring of boundaries: Public–private partnerships in health services in India”. Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 43, 62−71. DOI: 10.2307/40277081.
Camilleri, David and Mark O’Callaghan. 1998. “Comparing public and private hospital care service quality”. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, vol. 11(4−5), 127−133. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526869810216052.
Carvalho, João M.S. and Nuno Rodrigues. 2022. “Perceived quality and users' satisfaction with public−private partnerships in the health sector”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19(13), 8188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138188.
Caselli, Stefano, Guido Corbetta and Veronica Vecchi. 2015. “Public private partnerships for infrastructure and business development”. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137541482.
Dalton-Jez, Olivia, Simone Harvey-Rioux., David Barrows, and H. I. MacDonald. 2012. “Public−private partnerships in Canadian health care: A case study of the Brampton Civic Hospital”. OECD Journal on Budgeting, vol. 12, 1−14. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-12-5k9czxkbck9w.
De Marco, Alberto and Giulio Mangano. 2013. “Risk and value in privately financed health care projects”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 139, 918−926. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000660.
Donabedian, A. 1988. “The quality of care. How can it be assessed?” JAMA. Vol. 260(12), 1743−8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743.
Endeshaw, Berhanu. 2021. “Healthcare service quality-measurement models: A review”. Journal of Health Research, vol. 35(2), 106−117. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHR-03-2021-0045.
Gera, Kristina and Mariia Rubtcova. 2018. Public−private partnership (PPP) in health care of Russia: Sociological research. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, vol. 5, 45.
Hellowell, Mark. 2016. “The price of certainty: Benefits and costs of public–private partnerships for healthcare infrastructure and related services”. Health Services Management Research, vol. 29, 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951484816639742.
International Monetary Fund. (2004). Public−Private Partnerships. Fiscal Affairs Department. Available online: https://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/2004/pifp/eng/031204.pdf.
Lee, DonHee. 2017. “HEALTHQUAL: A multi-item scale for assessing healthcare service quality”. Service Business, vol. 11, 491−516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-017-0372-3.
Lee, DonHee and Kai K. Kim. 2017. “Assessing healthcare service quality: A comparative study of patient treatment types”. International Journal of Quality Innovation, vol. 3, 1−15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-017-0026-7.
Mota, J. and A. C. Moreira. 2015. “The importance of non-financial determinants on public–private partnerships in Europe”. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, 1563−1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.005.
Nabatchi, Tina and Lisa Blomgre Amsler. 2014. “Direct public engagement in local government”. The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 44(4_suppl), 63S−88S. DOI: 10.1177/0275074013519702.
Oliveira, Rafaela. 2023. “Contributions for the validation of the portuguese version of the vascular quallity of Life-6 questionnaire in peripheral artery disease patients (Doctoral dissertation)”. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/24709.
Roehrich, Jens K., Michael A. Lewis and Gerard George. 2014. “Are public−private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review”. Social Science & Medicine, vol. 113, 110−119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.037.
Shahin, Arash, Masoud Pourhamidi, Jiju Antony and Sung Park. 2013. “Typology of Kano models: a critical review of literature and proposition of a revised model”. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 30(3), 341−358. DOI: 10.1108/02656711311299863.
Skaggs, Beth, Isabel Pinto, Jessina Masamha, David Turgeon and Eduardo Samo Gudo. 2016. “Implementing laboratory quality management systems in Mozambique: The Becton Dickinson–US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief public−private partnership initiative”. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 213(Suppl 2), S47−S52. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiv544.
Zeithaml, Valarie, Leonard Berry and A Parsu Parasuraman. 1996. “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality.” Journal of marketing, vol. 60(2), 31−46. DOI: 10.1177/002224299606000203.
Zhang, Zhe, Difang Wan, Ming Jia and Lihong Gu. 2009. “Prior ties, shared values and cooperation in public–private partnerships”. Management and Organization Review, vol. 5, 353−374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00154.x.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Romanian Academy Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.