Structura maritală a populației Republicii Moldova în baza datelor studiului generații și gen (2020)

https://doi.org/10.46841/RCV.2022.04.04

Authors

  • Inga Chistruga-Sînchevici Institutul Național de Cercetări Economice, Chișinău

Keywords:

famlily, marriage, cohabitation, public – private partnership, divorce, separation, Generations and Gender study

Abstract

The population of the Republic of Moldova has adopted some trends recorded in European countries regarding matrimonial behavior and attitudes: postponing the official registration of marriage to a more mature age, the spread of premarital cohabitation, and celibacy for good. At the same time, the population has a favorable attitude towards marriage, and the need to create a family seems to be dominant in the socio-cultural context of the Republic of Moldova.

The article highlights the transformations occurring in the marital behavior of the population of the Republic of Moldova and is based on the data of the Generations and Gender (GGS) study, carried out in 2020 by UNFPA Moldova. The results of the analysis of both empirical data and official statistics reflect the same changes in the evolution of marriage and divorce phenomena. The research on the aspects related to the partner's presence, marriage, the average age at marriage, the average number of partnerships, and involvement in cohabitation shows a series of different characteristics for men and women depending on age. Cohabitation, as a marital trend in the Republic of Moldova, is practiced more and more, most often turning into marriage. Nuptial behavior is far from the stage where there is no distinction between cohabitation and marriage. The study found that the stability of marital relationships is influenced by a series of socio-demographic and economic factors: the presence of children, the duration of the relationship, the environment of residence, etc.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Inga Chistruga-Sînchevici, Institutul Național de Cercetări Economice, Chișinău

Address: 45 Ion Creangă Street, Chișinău, MD-2064, Republic of Moldova.
Email: i_sinchevici@yahoo.com

References

Baizan Pau, Aasve Arnstein și Billari Francesco C. 2003. „Cohabitation, Marriage, and First Birth: The Interrelationship of Family Formation Events in Spain”. European Journal of Population. 19: 147–169.

Cherlin Andrew J. 2004. „The deinstitutionalization of American marriage”. Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 848−861 DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.

Cherlin Andrew J. 2020. ”Degrees of Change: An Assessment of the Deinstitutionalization of Marriage Thesis”. Journal of Marriage and Family 82: 62–80. DOI:10.1111/jomf.12605.

Coleman David. 2013. ”Partnership in Europe; its Variety, Trends and Dissolution”. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 48: 5−49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.40927.

Di Giulio Paola, Impicciatore Roberto și Sironi Maria. 2019. „The changing pattern of cohabitation: A sequence analysis approach”. Demographic Research, 40: 1211−1248. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.42.

Gagauz Olga. 2011. „Familia contemporană între tradițional și modern”. Chișinău.

Gagauz Olga. (coord.) 2021. „Populația Republicii Moldova la 30 de ani de independență: provocări principale și politici necesare”. Chișinău.

Ghebrea Georgeta. 1999. ”Factori ce afectează stabilitatea cuplului marital”. Calitatea Vieții, 10: 3−41.

Hiekel Nicole, Liefbroer Aart C. și Poortman Anne-Right. 2014. „Understanding Diversity in the Meaning of Cohabitation Across Europe”. European Journal of Populationa, 30: 391−410. DOI:10.1007/s10680-014-9321-1.

Hoem Jan M, Kostova Dora, Jasilioniene Aiva și Mureșan Cornelia. 2009. „Traces of the Second Demographic Transition in Four Selected Countries in Central and Eastern Europe: Union Formation as a Demographic Manifestation”. Population, 25:239–255. DOI 10.1007/s10680-009-9177-y.

Jasilioniene Aiva. 2007. „Premarital conception and divorce risk in Russia in light of the GGS data”. MPIDR WORKING PAPER WP 025. DOI:10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2007-025.

Kiernan Kathleen. 2002. „Cohabitation in Western Europe: trends, issues and implications”. În: Booth Alan, Crouter Ann C. Just Living Together: implications of cohabitation on families, children and social policy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kostova Dora. 2007. „The emergence of cohabitation in a transitional socio-economic context: evidence from Bulgaria and Russia”. Demográfia English Edition, 50: 135−162.

Kulik Margarete. 2005. „The emergence of cohabitation as a first union and its later stability: the case of Hungarian women”. MPIDR Working Paper.

Mills Melinda și Hans-Peter Blossfeld. 2001. „A Causal Approach to Interrelated Family Events: A Cross-National Comparison fo Cohabitation, Non-marital Conception, and Marriage”. Canadian Studies in Population. 28: 409−437.

Mitrofanova Ekaterina și Artamonova Alyona. 2016. The perspectivs of family policy in Russia amid increasing cohabitation. European Journal of Government and Economics, 5:47−63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2016.5.1.4315.

Mureșan Cornelia. 2008. „Cohabitation, an alternative for marriage in contemporary Romania: a life table description”. Demográfia. 5:36–65.

Mynarska Monika și Bernardi Laura. 2007. „Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation”. Demographic Research, 16: 519−554. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.17.

Pasteels Inge, Lyssens-Danneboom Vicky și Mortelmans Dimitri 2015. „Defining and measuring the prevalence of LAT relationships in multi-purpose surveys. Identifying LAT relationships in Europe using the Gender and Generations Survey”. Families and societes, 25: 7−27.

Potârcă Gina, Mills Melinda și Lesnard Laurent. 2013. „Family Formation Trajectories in Romania, the Russian Federation and France: Towards the Second Demographic Transition? ”. Population, 29: 69–101. DOI 10.1007/s10680-012-9279-9.

Régnier-Loilier Arnaud. 2015 „Neither Single Nor in a Couple in France: What became of them three and six years later? ”. Families and societes, 25: 27−52.

Rosina Alessandro și Fraboni Romina. 2004. „Is marriage loosing its centrality in Italy?”. Demographic Research, 11: 149−172. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2004.11.6.

Smock Pamela J., Manning Wendy D. 1997. ”Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage”. Demography, 34: 331–34.

Sobotka Tomáš. 2008. „The diverse faces of the Second Demographic Transition in Europe”. Demographic Research, 19: 171−224. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.8.

Sobotka Tomáš și Toulemon Laurent. 2008. „Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe”. Demographic Research, 19: 85−138. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6.

Vignoli Daniele, Styrc Marta, Matysiak Anna și Tocchioni Valentina. 2018. „The positive impact of women’s employment on divorce: Context, selection, or anticipation? ”. Demographic Research, 38: 1059−1110. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.51.

Žilinčíková Zuzana și Hiekel Nicole. 2018. „Transition from Cohabitation to Marriage: the Role of Marital Attitudes in Seven Western and Eastern European Countries”. Comparative Population Studies, 43: 3−30. DOI.org/10.12765/CPoS-2018-04en.

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Chistruga-Sînchevici, I. (2022). Structura maritală a populației Republicii Moldova în baza datelor studiului generații și gen (2020). Calitatea Vieții, 33(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46841/RCV.2022.04.04

Issue

Section

Articles